友友英语网 首页 演讲致词 查看内容

中英双语(领导人演讲致辞):驻加拿大大使卢沙野在加《国会山时报》发表署名文章

2019-1-11 09:00| 发布者: admin| 查看: 91| 评论: 0

摘要: 驻加拿大大使卢沙野在加《国会山时报》发表署名文章Ambassador Lu Shaye published a signed article日前,两名加拿大公民因涉嫌从事危害中国国家安全活动,被中方有关部门依法采取强制措施。一些加媒体及人士无视中 ...
驻加拿大大使卢沙野在加《国会山时报》发表署名文章
Ambassador Lu Shaye published a signed article

日前,两名加拿大公民因涉嫌从事危害中国国家安全活动,被中方有关部门依法采取强制措施。一些加媒体及人士无视中国司法主权,纷纷指责中方做法是“任意拘押”,要求中方“立即放人”。而之前加方受美方指使,无端拘捕中国公民孟晚舟女士时,同样的人却发表了截然相反的言论,他们说,加方拘捕在机场转机的中国公民是“依法行事”,尽管她没有受到加方任何违法指控。
Recently, China's competent authorities took compulsory measures in accordance with the law against two Canadian nationals who are suspected of engaging in activities that endanger China's national security. Some Canadians and some in the Canadian news media, in disregard of China's judicial sovereignty, accused China of arbitrary detention and demanded their immediate release.
However, on the prior groundless detention of Chinese citizen Meng Wanzhou by Canada at the behest of the United States, these same people made utterly different comments. They insisted that Canada's detention of a Chinese citizen who was transferring planes at the airport was "acting in accordance with law," though Meng has not been charged with any violation of Canadian law.
加方对自己公民的遭遇心存关切,这可以理解。但他们何曾对被加非法拘捕而被剥夺自由的孟晚舟女士表达过关心和同情?孟女士没有违反加任何法律,她只是在温哥华机场转机就被拘捕并被戴上手铐脚镣。在一些人眼中,似乎只有加拿大公民才应享有人道主义待遇,他们的人身自由才可宝贵,中国人则不配。
It's understandable that these Canadians are concerned about their own citizens. But have they shown any concern or sympathy for Meng after she was illegally detained and deprived of freedom?
Without violating any Canadian law, Meng was arrested last month and put in handcuffs just as she was changing planes at the Vancouver International Airport. It seems that, to some people, only Canadian citizens shall be treated in a humanitarian manner and their freedom deemed valuable, while Chinese people do not deserve that.
当中方要求加方释放孟晚舟女士,切实保障她的合法、正当权益时,在媒体上发表言论的精英人士口口声声称加是“法治国家”,“司法独立”,要“依法行事”。但当涉及本国公民在中国涉嫌违法被拘押时,他们则完全不顾中国也有法律,蛮横地要求中方“立即放人”。在他们眼中,加拿大等西方国家的法律才是法律,需要遵守,而中国的法律不算法律,不值得尊重。
When China called on the Canadian side to release Meng and ensure her legal and legitimate rights and interests, those elites claimed in the media that Canada is a country of rule of law and has an independent judiciary, and therefore it must comply with the judicial proceeding. However, in the case of detention of Canadian citizens in China who violated China's law, those elites completely dismissed China's law and presumptuously urged China to immediately release their citizens. It seems that, to those people, the laws of Canada or other Western countries are laws and must be observed, while China's laws are not and shouldn't be respected.
加方一些人在无任何证据的情况下大肆炒作“华为公司受中国政府控制,对加等西方国家安全构成威胁”,“中国法律要求中国企业协助政府从事间谍活动”。然而,他们却对有关国家设立“棱镜计划”、“方程式组织”和“Echelon”全球间谍网络并长期对外国政府、企业和个人进行大规模、有组织网络窃密和监听监控活动“选择性失明”,对有关国家凭借“爱国者法案”侵犯公民隐私视而不见,对“五眼联盟”国家政府公然禁止本国企业使用华为设备的“政府控制”行为摇舌鼓噪。中国制定的国家安全和情报方面的法律,大量借鉴了美国、加拿大和其他西方国家的相关法律条文。同样的事情西方国家做叫“维护国家安全”,中国做就是“从事间谍活动”。这是什么逻辑?
Some people in Canada, without any evidence, have been hyping the idea that Huawei is controlled by the Chinese government and poses security threats to Canada and other Western countries, and that Chinese law requires China's enterprises to collaborate with the government in espionage activities. However, these same people have conveniently ignored the PRISM Program, Equation Group, and Echelon-global spying networks operated by some countries that have been engaging in large-scale and organized cyber stealing, and spying and surveillance activities on foreign governments, enterprises, and individuals. These people also took a laissez-faire attitude toward a country that infringes on its citizens' privacy rights through the Patriot Act. They shouted for a ban by the Five Eyes alliance countries (Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States) on the use of Huawei equipment by these countries' own enterprises, which is literally a government-controlled action.
When making laws for national security and intelligence, China has drawn references from the relevant laws of the U.S., Canada, and other Western countries. Something is considered as "safeguarding national security" when it is done by Western countries. But it is termed "conducting espionage" when done by China. What's the logic?
加拉上美、英等个别国家就以“国际社会”的名义向中国施压,要求中方“放人”。难道屈指可数的几个西方国家就能代表“国际社会”吗?在动辄以“国际社会”自居的某些人眼里,非西方国家都不是国际社会成员,国际事务也只有他们这几个国家说了才算。
Canada, pulling a few individual countries such as the U.S. and the U.K. on its side, pressed China in the name of "the international community" to release its citizens. Do a handful of Western countries really represent the whole international community? To those would-be representatives of the international community, non-Western countries are not members of the international community and only their countries can call the shots on international affairs.
最近我常听到一个词:霸凌。有人说,中国抓了两个加拿大人,以报复加方拘捕孟晚舟女士,这是中国对加拿大的霸凌。在一些人眼里,中国的任何自卫行动都是对加拿大的侵犯。“当别人打你的左脸时,你要把右脸伸过去”,他们这样对我们说。然而,我从来没见过他们自己这样做过。
I have recently heard a word repeatedly pronounced by some Canadians: bullying. They said that by arresting two Canadian citizens as retaliation for Canada's detention of Meng, China was bullying Canada. To those people, China's self-defence is an offence to Canada. If someone slaps you on your left cheek, give him your right cheek, they told us. But I have never seen them doing as they said.
  某些人之所以习惯于傲慢地采取双重标准,归根结底还是“西方中心论”和“白人优越论”在作祟。在这样的语境下,法治只不过是他们实现政治目的的工具,是在国际上推行霸权主义的遮羞布罢了。他们的所做所为不是对法治的尊崇,恰恰是对法治的嘲弄和践踏。
The reason why some people are used to arrogantly adopting double standards is due to Western egotism and white supremacy. In such a context, the rule of law is nothing but a tool for their political ends and a fig leaf for their practising hegemony in the international arena. What they have been doing is not showing respect for the rule of law, but mocking and trampling the rule of law.
2020考研+MTI+CATTI免费学习群
新浪微博@Bluce学英语
个人微信号:Blucestudy
微信昵称:李小龙我偶像

一、学习活动简介
本学习群于工作日整理且不限于:中国日报双语新闻、英语热词(中国日报、卢敏微博、北京周报等)、汉语写作与百科知识、英语写作经典范文、英语翻译练习、英语阅读长难句解析、金融时报双语、经济学人双语、纽约时报双语、
领导人演讲致辞双语、英语语法知识、翻译硕士真题、英语口语(大牛、领导人演讲)等!本群主要助攻2020考研的同学、备考MTI与CATTI的同学、英语学习爱好者等!本学习群致力于培养各位同学坚持学习、每日学习的习惯!同时,双语外刊的阅读、大牛与领导人演讲致辞英文视频的观看,帮助大家快速获得重大新闻的相关背景知识,提高知识储备,扩展视野,避免死读书,读死书,帮助大家一举拿下考试!

二、学习活动内容
1)中国日报双语新闻
世界热点,原汁原味的外刊,外刊中的战斗机!视博主工作忙与闲,每周至少提供三次!对这一部分感兴趣的同学,可以选择精读,增加词汇、弄懂长难句、增加阅读能力,提升写作水平!
2)英语热词
英语热词是翻译硕士考试、CATTI考试必不可少的内容,英语热词势必是相关同学必须拿下的!工作日英语热词主要整理于中国日报新闻热词、卢敏微博、北京周报等(同学亦可提供其它来源,博主整理)!视博主忙与闲,每周至少提供三次!
3)汉语写作百科知识
汉语写作与百科知识是翻译硕士考试必不可少的一门课,势必是相关同学必需攻下的科目!欢迎相关同学提供知识来源,博主整理,视博主忙与闲,每周至少提供三次!
4)英语写作经典范文
英语写作伴随英语学习者一生,英语写作伴随各种考试,经典的英语写作范文必定对你的写作水平起到强大的助攻,视博主忙与闲,每周至少提供三次!
5)英语翻译练习
汉语是我们的母语,翻译是我们必备的基础能力,同时翻译也伴随着各种考试!拿下英语翻译,得英语天下!经典的英语翻译,让你掌握各种翻译技巧!视博主忙与闲,每周至少提供三次!
6)英语阅读长难句解析
长难句一直是英语阅读中的难点,让人头疼脑热!细致的讲解、语法知识的补充、翻译技巧的学习,让长难句倒在你的脚下!视群主忙与闲,每周至少提供三次!
7)三大压轴外刊(经济学人、纽约时报、金融时报)
三大外刊一直是各种英语考试阅读的来源!三大外刊聚焦世界热点,原汁原味,外刊中的精品!英语学习者不可或缺的外刊!视博主忙与闲,每周至少提供三次!
8)领导人演讲致辞
领导人演讲致辞是翻译硕士考试与CATTI考试必需拿下的,每一年的翻译硕士考试与CATTI考试必考领导人演讲!主要提供中国领导人及各大使的演讲致辞、署名文章、访谈、政府报告、白皮书等!视博主忙与闲,每周至少提供三次!
9)英语语法知识
英语语法是学习英语的基础,不拿下语法,如何学好英语?视博主忙与闲,每周至少提供三次!
10)翻译硕士真题
各大高校最近五年真题整理!视博主忙与闲,每周至少提供三次!
11)英语口语
各位大牛、领导人最新演讲!视博主忙与闲,每周至少提供三次!
12)其它整理
视各位同学要求,博主会做相应整理!
13)早起打卡
工作日七点前必须拍下一张照片发到群内,如果你坚持不了,请不要进群,每周会清理不打卡者!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

三、参与者究竟能得到什么?
1)早起习惯!
一年之际在于春,一日之际在于晨!看到那么多同学早起打卡,你还能悠闲自得的在被窝里睡大头觉吗?
2)每日学习习惯
行动大于一切的想象,行动治愈一切的伤痕!行动,是你通往成功之路的良药!每日的学习就是一种简单而实际的行动!专注与认真,融洽的学习气氛与交流,本群必备!在这里,你会遇到志同道合的逐梦人!在这里,你会遇到良师益友!在这里,你会找寻到更好的自己,实现自己的梦想!
3)知识的积累
我们仅能看到马云、马化腾、刘强东等今日的成功,又有几人能看到他们当初的努力与付出?你想要成功,你想要比别人强,你想要干事业,你整日睡大觉如何实现?知识的积累是你通向成功的康庄大道,是你走向成功的推手,是你事业的基座!同学们,让我们一起行动起来吧,小定“一个亿”的目标!!

四、进群条件
1)早起打卡
工作日七点前必须拍下一张照片发到群内,如果你坚持不了,请不要进群,每周会清理不打卡者!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2)非志同道合者,捣乱者,发广告者,推广者,误怪本人开骂!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
3)如果感觉到本群有利于你及身边的朋友学习,麻烦转发下,谢谢!
4)如果感觉到微博中的内容有利于你及朋友的学习,麻烦转发下,谢谢!

备注:进群条件1)与2)是必需要遵守的!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

进群时间:每晚

满足进群条件1)与2)者,请加个人微信:Blucestudy
 







鲜花

握手

雷人

路过

鸡蛋
返回顶部
用手机微信扫一扫